An AI response can contain a well-structured explanation and still get an important detail wrong. The same confident style may appear in a supported statement, a mistaken calculation, or a reference that does not exist.
Identify the claims that matter to the task and check them against an appropriate source or direct observation. Inspect references themselves rather than assuming that a realistic title points to a real document.
Keep uncertainty in the working result until the check is complete. A draft can still be useful as a starting point, but the step from plausible text to a dependable conclusion requires evidence beyond the tone of the answer.
- Identify the claims that materially matter.
- Open and inspect cited references.
- Keep unverified details visibly provisional.
Imagine a practical setting.
Consider an assistant describing a setting in a familiar application. Check the current interface before following an instruction that only sounds plausible.
Before the next experiment.
Treat an example as part of the instruction. Its omissions and boundaries can influence a result as much as the words that describe the task.
Follow a related question
Identify which summary is being reported.
Mean and median see different detailsCompare one object under two light sources.
A color depends on the lightKeep learning
Related background to continue exploring this subject.
NIST: AI risk management framework Google: prompt design strategies
